PORÓWNANIE TRYBÓW DOCHODZENIA ROSZCZEŃ KARNOPROCESOWYCH I CYWILNOPRAWNYCH ZA NIESŁUSZNE SKAZANIE, TYMCZASOWE ARESZTOWANIE BĄDŹ ZATRZYMANIE

Abstrakt

Code of Criminal Procedure provides some kind of possibility of seeking compensation for wrongful conviction, temporary detention or detention. Claims, pursuant to article 552 § 1 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, does not provide for exceptions to the principle of full compensation of damages. It includes both claims for damages for actual loss as well as for lost profits. The indicated provision corresponds to art. 417 § 1 of the Civil Code and article 4171 § 2 of the Civil Code The State Treasury is liable for damage caused by unlawful act or comission in the exercise of public authority. If the damage was caused by issuing a final decision or a final decision, its remedy can be demanded after it has been found in the proper proceedings that they are unlawful. Therefore, whether the situation described in article 552 of the Code of Criminal Procedure - the revocation of a final judgment by way of cassation, as a result of which a more favorable decision is issued for the accused, is the state equivalent to finding the unlawfulness of the ruling thus violated? The liability of the State Treasury for damage and harm caused by unjust condemnation, arrest or detention, in many cases, extend the scope of this responsibility to states that could not be classified as unlawful acts or omissions in the exercise of public authority. Depending on the choice of position, one should consider maintaining a separate criminal and civil procedure for examining cases for damages for unjustified conviction, temporary detention or detention.